Table 4.

Secondary adopters versus non-adopters analysis for BMI, fruit and vegetable intake, perceptions of food access

	Baseline	Follow-up	Difference-in-Difference
	Difference between those who adopted the new supermarket as their secondary store and non-adopters	Difference between those who adopted the new supermarket as their secondary store and non-adopters	Unadjusted	Adjusted
	(Unadjusted)	(Unadjusted)
BMIa	1.07	0.75	−0.32ns	-
Fruit and vegetable intake	−0.32	−0.10	0.23ns	-
Perceptions of food access	−0.81	1.24	2.22***	2.05***
Grocer Choice	−0.64	0.06	0.70***	0.67***
Grocer Quality	−0.24	0.515	0.76***	0.72***
F&V Choiceb	−0.27	0.429	0.70***	0.65***
F&V Qualityb	−0.20	0.35	0.55***	0.50**
F&V Expenseb	0.32	−0.16	−0.48**	−0.49**

^aBody Mass Index,

^bFruit & Vegetable

^***P ≤ 0.001

^**P ≤ 0.01

^*P ≤ 0.05 ^nsnot statistically significant

Authors calculation based on analytical data. Adjusted analyses controlled for: age, sex, race/ethnicity, presence of children, household income, education, employment status, and mode of transport