Appendix 2.

Exhibit 1 Full descriptive characteristic of analytical samples in the study

	All		Sub-samples (by outcome)
			BMI		Fruit & Vegetable Intake		Perceptions of Food Access
Eligible Samples
Sample size, n:	656		619		625		539
Resident in intervention area, n (%)	311 (47)		294 (47)		294 (47)		247 (46)
Adopted intervention as main store, n (%)	83 (13)		80 (13)		79 (13)		64 (12)
Adopted intervention as secondary store, n (%)	160 (24)		152 (25)		153 (24)		128 (24)
Baseline sample characteristics	Contr	Int	Contr	Int	Contr	Int	Contr	Int
Gender (%)
Male	67 (19)	67 (22)	67 (21)	65 (22)	63 (19)	60 (20)	60 (21)	55 (22)
Female	277 (80)	244 (78)	257 (79)	229 (78)	267 (81)	234 (80)	232 (79)	192 (78)
Missing	1 (0)	0 (0)	1 (0)	0 (0)	1 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Age in years
Mean (SD)	52.7 (14)	54.2 (16)	53.6 (13)	54.9 (16)	52.7 (14)	54.2 (16)	52.0 (13)	53.5 (15)
Missing (%)	4 (1)	4 (1)	3 (1)	4 (1)	4 (1)	4 (1)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Race/Ethnicity (%)
Black	283 (82)	268 (86)	269 (83)	253 (86)	270 (82)	254 (86)	242 (83)	219 (89)
White	43 (12)	13 (4)	41 (13)	13 (4)	42 (13)	12 (4)	37 (13)	12 (5)
Hispanic	7 (2)	6 (2)	6 (2)	5 (2)	7 (2)	6 (2)	6 (2)	4 (2)
Other	7 (2)	16 (5)	6 (2)	16 (5)	7 (2)	16 (5)	7 (2)	12 (5)
Missing	5 (1)	8 (3)	3 (1)	7 (2)	5 (2)	6 (2)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Household income (%)
<$40,000 per year	210 (61)	207 (67)	197 (61)	196 (67)	199 (60)	195 (66)	188 (64)	172 (70)
>$40,000 per year	112 (32)	88 (28)	106 (33)	85 (29)	110 (33)	85 (29)	104 (36)	75 (30)
Missing	23 (7)	16 (5)	22 (7)	13 (4)	22 (7)	14 (5)	0 (0)	0 (0)
High school graduate (%)
Yes	297 (86)	260 (84)	277 (85)	247 (84)	288 (87)	249 (85)	251 (86)	216 (87)
No	48 (14)	50 (16)	48 (15)	47 (16)	43 (13)	44 (15)	41 (14)	31 (13)
Missing	0 (0)	1 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Labour market status (%)
Employed	164 (48)	134 (43)	155 (48)	127 (43)	160 (48)	131 (45)	144 (49)	119 (48)
Unemployed	35 (10)	34 (11)	30 (9)	33 (11)	34 (10)	33 (11)	33 (11)	26 (11)
Inactive	145 (42)	142 (46)	139 (43)	134 (46)	136 (41)	129 (44)	115 (39)	102 (41)
Missing	1 (0)	1 (0)	1 (0)	0 (0)	1 (0)	1 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Children under 12 in household (%)
Yes	80 (23)	68 (22)	73 (22)	66 (22)	79 (24)	68 (23)	74 (25)	61 (25)
No	265 (77)	243 (78)	252 (78)	228 (78)	252 (76)	226 (77)	218 (75)	186 (75)
Missing	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Public transport for food shopping (%)
Yes	71 (21)	86 (28)	67 (21)	82 (28)	66 (20)	82 (28)	55 (19)	67 (27)
No	274 (79)	225 (72)	258 (79)	212 (72)	265 (80)	212 (72)	237 (81)	180 (73)
Missing	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Has own car for food shopping (%)
Yes	190 (55)	141 (45)	178 (55)	135 (46)	186 (56)	132 (45)	164 (56)	115 (47)
No	155 (45)	170 (55)	147 (45)	159 (54)	145 (44)	162 (55)	128 (44)	132 (53)
Missing	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Walks for food shopping (%)
Yes	47 (14)	36 (12)	45 (14)	33 (11)	45 (14)	34 (12)	42 (14)	32 (13)
No	298 (86)	275 (88)	280 (86)	261 (89)	286 (86)	260 (88)	250 (86)	215 (87)
Missing	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Outcomes at baseline and follow-up	Contr	Int	Contr	Int	Contr	Int	Contr	Int
BMI
Baseline mean (SD)	29.2 (7)	30.1 (7)	29.1 (7)	30.1 (7)	29.2 (7)	30.1 (7)	29.2 (7)	30.4 (7)
Missing (%)	12 (4)	4 (1)	0 (0)	0 (0)	12 (4)	4 (1)	11 (4)	2 (1)
Follow-up mean (SD)	29.6 (7)	30.1 (7)	29.5 (7)	30.1 (7)	29.6 (7)	30.1 (7)	29.5 (7)	30.3 (7)
Missing (%)	11 (3)	12 (4)	0 (0)	0 (0)	11 (3)	12 (4)	9 (3)	8 (3)
Daily F&V Intake
Baseline mean (SD)	3.7 (2)	3.5 (3)	3.7 (2)	3.5 (3)	3.7 (2)	3.5 (3)	3.7 (2)	3.6 (3)
Missing (%)	0 (0)	0 (0)	9 (3)	5 (2)	0 (0)	0 (0)	5 (2)	4 (2)
Follow-up mean (SD)	3.5 (2)	3.3 (2)	3.5 (2)	3.3 (2)	3.5 (2)	3.3 (2)	3.5 (2)	3.3 (2)
Missing (%)	0 (0)	0 (0)	4 (1)	8 (3)	0 (0)	0 (0)	2 (1)	4 (2)
Perceptions of food access (summary scale)
Baseline mean (SD)
Missing (%)	14.8 (4)	13.7 (4)	14.9 (4)	13.7 (4)	14.8 (4)	13.7 (4)	14.8 (4)	13.6 (4)
Follow-up mean (SD)	7 (2)	14 (5)	10 (3)	15 (5)	7 (2)	14 (5)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Missing (%)	15.6 (4)	15.9 (4)	15.7 (4)	15.9 (4)	15.6 (4)	15.9 (4)	15.5 (4)	16.0 (4)
	8 (2)	12 (4)	11 (3)	14 (5)	8 (2)	12 (4)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Perceptions of food access (separate dimensions):
Good choice of different types of grocery stores in neighborhood
Baseline mean (SD)	2.8 (1)	2.3 (1)	2.8 (1)	2.3 (1)	2.8 (1)	2.3 (1)	2.8 (1)	2.3 (1)
Missing (%)	1 (0)	0 (0)	1 (0)	0 (0)	1 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Follow-up mean (SD)	3.1 (1)	3.0 (1)	3.1 (1)	3.0 (1)	3.1 (1)	3.1 (1)	3.1 (1)	3.1 (1)
Missing (%)	2 (1)	6 (2)	1 (0)	4 (1)	1 (0)	3 (1)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Quality of grocery stores in neighborhood is good
Baseline mean (SD)	3.0 (1)	2.8 (1)	3.0 (1)	2.8 (1)	3.0 (1)	2.8 (1)	3.0 (1)	2.8 (1)
Missing (%)	2 (1)	2 (1)	2 (1)	2 (1)	2 (1)	2 (1)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Follow-up mean (SD)	3.3 (1)	3.5 (1)	3.3 (1)	3.5 (1)	3.3 (1)	3.5 (1)	3.3 (1)	3.5 (1)
Missing (%)	5 (1)	5 (2)	4 (1)	3 (1)	2 (1)	3 (1)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Choice of fresh fruit and vegetables to purchase in neighbourhood is good
Baseline mean (SD)	3.3 (1)	3.0 (1)	3.3 (1)	2.9 (1)	3.3 (1)	2.9 (1)	3.3 (1)	3.0 (1)
Missing (%)	1 (0)	1 (0)	1 (0)	1 (0)	1 (0)	1 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Follow-up mean (SD)	3.4 (1)	3.5 (1)	3.4 (1)	3.5 (1)	3.1 (1)	3.5 (1)	3.4 (1)	3.5 (1)
Missing (%)	6 (2)	2 (1)	5 (2)	1 (0)	3 (1)	1 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Quality of fresh fruit and vegetables to purchase in neighbourhood is good
Baseline mean (SD)	3.3 (1)	3.0 (1)	3.3 (1)	3.0 (1)	3.3 (1)	3.0 (1)	3.3 (1)	3.0 (1)
Missing (%)	3 (1)	4 (1)	3 (1)	3 (1)	1 (0)	2 (1)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Follow-up mean (SD)	3.4 (1)	3.5 (1)	3.4 (1)	3.5 (1)	3.5 (1)	3.5 (1)	3.4 (1)	3.5 (1)
Missing (%)	3 (1)	2 (1)	2 (1)	1 (0)	1 (0)	1 (0)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Fresh fruit and vegetables in neighbourhood are expensive
Baseline mean (SD)	2.4 (1)	2.6 (1)	2.4 (1)	2.6 (1)	2.4 (1)	2.6 (1)	2.4 (1)	2.6 (1)
Missing (%)	6 (2)	13 (4)	6 (2)	13 (4)	5 (2)	12 (4)	0 (0)	0 (0)
Follow-up mean (SD)	2.3 (1)	2.3 (1)	2.4 (1)	2.3 (1)	2.4 (1)	2.3 (1)	2.4 (1)	2.3 (1)
Missing (%)	8 (2)	10 (3)	7 (2)	8 (3)	7 (2)	7 (2)	0 (0)	0 (0)