Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Genet Med. 2013 Sep 26;15(10):772–778. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.131

Table 3.

Strategies for storing genetic and genomic test results in electronic health records (EHRs)

Storage strategy Pros Cons
Detailed results stored in EHR as a laboratory result (e.g., each SNP, insertion/deletion) All information about the test result is available directly from the EHR
Changes to how genetic variants are interpreted are immediately actionable through decision support
Significant storage needed for EHRs
Introduces more results that must be sorted/filtered when reviewing laboratory results
Complex decision support logic and reasoning is required within the EHR
Point-in-time interpretation Reduced storage requirements in the EHR
Computable result may be integrated into decision support
Loss of detailed information regarding genetic results
Requires retesting and reinterpretation if knowledge about affected variants changes over time
External data warehouse linked back to EHR Same benefits as the point-in-time interpretation
Preserves original data, allowing review and reinterpretation of the results as needed
Interpretation of genomic results may take advantage of more advanced computational approaches not available within EHRs
Allows time for best practice evaluation and integration into the clinical workflow
Requires development and maintenance of a robust interface to integrate back into the EHR
Investment in creation and maintenance of the ancillary storage system

SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.