Table 6.
Outcome | Obs. | OLS or Probit | IV-2SLS or IV-Probit | IV specification tests | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
(1) | (2) Coeff. | (3) (S.E.)† | (4) Coeff. | (5) (S.E.)† | (6) Overid | (7) Exo. | |
Daughter-in-law sample | |||||||
Prob(Pain affecting daily activities) | 2527 | 0.18** | (0.08) | 0.33** | (0.13) | NS | NS |
Prob(Self-reported health fair to poor) | 2527 | 0.08 | (0.08) | 0.25** | (0.13) | NS | * |
Prob(Any outpatient care use) | 2524 | 0.03 | (0.09) | −0.10 | (0.12) | NS | NS |
Log(Out-of-pocket costs) if any use | 1548 | 0.10 | (0.10) | 0.24* | (0.14) | NS | NS |
Prob(Any regular prescription drug use) | 2527 | 0.14* | (0.08) | 0.16 | (0.12) | NS | NS |
Log(Out-of-pocket costs) if any use | 720 | 0.13 | (0.10) | 0.15 | (0.15) | NS | NS |
Notes: NS denotes ‘not significant’ at the 10% level. Logarithm of weekly care hours was used. F-statistics for first-stage regressions were 26 in the four IV-Probit models and 23 and 12 in the two conditional IV-2SLS models. The same set of control variables were used as in Table 5. One observation was dropped because of missing value for caregiving hours.
Robust standard errors in parentheses.
p<0.01,
p<0.05,
p<0.1.