. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2014 Apr 18;73(3):1065–1074. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25221

Table 2. Mean T₂ values of various brain regions from literature, fully sampled data, and accelerated methods.

All results shown used the EPG model in the T₂ estimation. In all cases, voxelwise paired t-tests indicated that differences between fully sampled data from the present study and all accelerated acquisitions were statistically significant. Values from literature were estimated from Fig 6 in Ref 22.

	ROI mean T₂ (ms)
	Fully Sampled		Accelerated, R = 6.6
	Literature (22)	Present Study	ME-CAMBREC (R = 6.6)	Fourier-EP (R = 6.6)	Fourier-VT (R = 6.6)
Corpus Callosum, Genu	68.2	68.7	66.7	72.3	67.7
Corpus Callosum, Splenium	80.4	84.7	80.4	84.2	77.7
Cortical Grey Matter	80.0	84.1	81.3	86.5	74.1
Insular cortex	85.6	83.8	82.0	81.2	74.4
Thalamus	65.6	68.0	66.3	70.6	60.2

Table 2. Mean T2 values of various brain regions from literature, fully sampled data, and accelerated methods.

Table 2. Mean T₂ values of various brain regions from literature, fully sampled data, and accelerated methods.