Fig. 3. Simulated and experimental CEST versus CESL contrast.
(A–D) MTRasym and SLRasym, as a function of irradiation duration tirrad, were simulated with CEAPA solutions for selected ω1 values. Two different R2 values were used: 3 s−1 (A–B) and 25 s−1 (C–D). SLRasym (solid lines in A and C) is always larger than MTRasym (dashed lines), but the difference is more significant at higher ω1 and shorter tirrad values. The ratio of SLRasym to MTRasym (B and D) ranges between 1/cos2θ at very short tirrad and 1/cosθ at long tirrad, approaching the steady state. Other parameters used were R1 = 0.35 s−1, PS = 0.001, and δ = 400 Hz. (E–F) MTRasym (open symbols) and SLRasym (filled symbols) of 50 mM myo-inositol (Ins) in PBS were measured at 1 ppm with ω1 = 100, 200, and 400 Hz at varying irradiation durations (E), and their ratios were obtained (F). For the highest ω1 of 400 Hz, we only acquired tirrad up to 2 s to minimize RF heating in the samples. MTRasym and SLRasym peaks shift to shorter tirrad at higher ω1. The ratio between SLRasym and MTRasym increases with ω1 and is larger at shorter irradiation times (F). To verify the experimental data with CEAPA models, on-resonance spin-locking experiments as a function of ω1 were performed, and chemical exchange parameters were obtained (see texts). Simulated MTRasym and SLRasym data (lines in E) using these chemical exchange parameters match well with the experimental data (symbols in E). tirad: off-resonance irradiation time.