Table 2.

Summary of average evaluation responses for journal clubs

Evaluation Itema	Journal Club 1			Journal Club 2			Journal Club 3			Journal Club 4			Journal Club 5
	Ac	C	p	A	C	p	A	C	p	A	C	p	A	C	p
	n=24	n=4		n=14	n=6		n=17	n=4		n=10	n=0		n=17	n=3
The journal club content was relevant to my practice, work, or studies	4.5	4.5	.944	4.2	4.5	.266	4.6	4.7	.715	4.7	–	–	4.2	4.7	.530
The journal club stimulated my interest in CBPR	4.5	4.8	.850	4.3	4.5	.437	4.6	4.5	.950	4.7	–	–	4.4	4.0	.318
The journal club discussion was easy to understand	4.8	4.8	NA	4.8	4.5	NA	4.9	4.5	NA	4.8	–	–	4.7	4.7	NA
The journal club provided me with new information that is directly applicable to my practice, work, or studies	4.4	4.5	.653	4.0	4.3	.892	4.5	4.7	.887	4.7	–	–	4.2	3.3	.113
I learned more about CBPR during the discussion	4.5	4.5	.450	4.5	4.2	.698	4.2	4.5	.551	4.6	–	–	4.5	4.0	.340
The information discussed was useful	4.7	4.5	NA	4.4	4.5	NA	4.8	4.5	NA	4.7	–	–	4.4	4.7	NA
The discussion leader provided relevant information about the topic of CBPR	4.8	4.5	NA	4.6	4.5	NA	4.8	4.5	NA	4.7	–	–	4.6	4.7	NA
The article that was discussed was relevant to CBPR	5.0	4.5	NA	4.7	4.5	NA	4.6	4.5	NA	4.9	–	–	4.6	4.7	NA
The location for this journal club was convenient for me	4.3	4.0	NA	4.6	4.2	NA	4.8	4.0	NA	4.7	–	–	4.4	5.0	NA
Overall rating	4.4	4.0	.260	4.2	4.0	.625	4.4	4.0	.524	4.4	–	–	4.2	3.7	.231

^aRating scale for evaluation items: 1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3=neither agree or disagree; 4=agree; 5=strongly agree

^bJournal Club 1: Engaging Community Advisory Panels in Research Studies; Journal Club 2: CBPR: Are Researchers Prepared?; Journal Club 3: Service Learning and Community Engagement; Journal Club 4: Developing a Community Action Plan to Eliminate Cancer Health Disparities: Lessons Learned; Journal Club 5: Challenges in Implementing Intervention Trials in Community Engaged Research

^cA = academic partner; C = community partner

Note: NA = not assessed