Table 1.
Characteristic | Trainees (N=70)* | Trainers (N=40)* |
---|---|---|
Age | ||
20–30 | 65 (93%) | 2 (5%) |
31–40 | 2 (3%) | 13 (32%) |
41+ | 3 (4%) | 24 (61%) |
Gender | ||
Male | 31 (44%) | 24 (60%) |
Female | 39 (56%) | 16 (40%) |
Ethnicity | ||
White | 57 (81%) | 37 (93%) |
Non-white | 13 (19%) | 3 (8%) |
Language | ||
English | 60 (86%) | 36 (90%) |
English as second language | 10 (14%) | 3 (8%) |
Trainers’ years since graduation | ||
0–10 | – | 8 (20%) |
11–20 | – | 15 (38%) |
21+ | – | 16 (41%) |
Trainers’ years of PGME experience | ||
0–10 | – | 26 (64%) |
11–20 | – | 9 (23%) |
21+ | – | 4 (11%) |
Trainers’ specialties | ||
Hospital (medical)† | – | 16 (40%) |
Hospital (surgical) | – | 5 (13%) |
Hospital (services) | – | 8 (20%) |
General practice | – | 5 (13%) |
Nurse | – | 4 (10%) |
Number of SLEs conducted | ||
Median | 8 | 6 |
Range | 3–25 | 0–40 |
Had experience with tools as SLEs?‡ | ||
DOPS | 42 (60%) | 16 (40%) |
Mini-CEX | 46 (66%) | 25 (63%) |
CBD | 45 (64%) | 26 (65%) |
DCT | 10 (14%) | 6 (15%) |
Number of WPBA conducted | ||
Median | 19.5 | 30 |
Range | 8–28 | 0–40 |
Had experience with tools as WPBAs?‡ | ||
DOPS | 24 (34%) | 20 (50%) |
Mini-CEX | 24 (34%) | 30 (75%) |
CBD | 24 (34%) | 30 (75%) |
*These figures are rounded up to zero decimal places so may not always add up to 100%.
†Medical specialties included neurology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, anaesthesiology and psychiatry, surgical specialties included ophthalmology and orthopaedics, and services specialties included infectious diseases and dermatology.
‡These figures represent a free-text question asking participants to outline which tools they had used so numbers are likely to be under-estimates.
CBD, Case-based Discussion; DCT, Developing the Clinical Teacher; DOPS, Direct Observation of Procedural Skills; Mini-CEX, Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercise; SLEs, supervised learning events; WPBAs, workplace-based assessments.