Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct;28(10):4292–4302. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-251579

Table 3.

Open probability and kinetics of MscL channels from different organisms

Organism Negative pressure
Negative pressure and LPC
P1/2 (mmHg) τ1 (ms) τ2 (ms) Conductance, G (nS) P1/2 (mmHg) τ1 (ms) τ2 (ms) τ3 (ms) Conductance, G (nS)
M. tuberculosis 155.75 ± 0.29 <1 <1 3.26 ± 0.10 35.06 ± 0.07 <1 6.03 ± 1.47 (27) 17.60 ± 7.36 (28) 3.18 ± 1.09
L. lactis 142.50 ± 1.76 <1 1.85 ± 0.18 (38) 1.80 ± 0.27 78.24 ± 0.50 <1 2.68 ± 0.21 (37) 31.16 ± 3.50 (3) 1.85 ± 0.33
E. coli 95.17 ± 0.33 <1 3.95 ± 0.08 (49) 3.70 ± 0.23 34.63 ± 0.48 <1 8.73 ± 0.15 (41) 47.82 ± 0.26 (23) 3.92 ± 0.33

Data are means ± se (% normalized population). Open probability, dwell time, and single-channel conductance of MscL homologs activated by negative pressure or LPC plus with negative pressure are shown. The P1/2 of Ec-MscL is the lowest in the presence of negative pressure only, followed by Ll-MscL and Tb-MscL. On the other hand, activation of channels by negative pressure and 9.5 μM LPC has an overall significant impact on the P1/2 and dwell times of all MscL homologs, but the change is the greatest for Tb-MscL.