Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 21;20(39):14280–14291. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14280

Table 1.

Noticeable prospective randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy

Region Country East
West
Japan South Korea China Italy
Author Kitano et al[30] Hayashi et al[31] Lee et al[33] Takiguchi et al[36] Kim et al[34,47] Kim et al[35] Cai et al[56] Huscher et al[32]
Year 2002 2002 2005 2013 2008, 2013 2010 2011 2005
Patients 28 28 47 40 164 342 123 59
Reconstruction B-I B-I B-I B-I B-I B-I or B-II (mostly) B-I or B-II B-II or R-Y
Lymphadenectomy type D1 + a D1 + a D2 D1 + b or D2 D1 + b or D2 D1 + b or D2 D2 D1 or D2
Blood Loss NS NS
Operation Time NR NS
Pain or analgesia consumption NS NR NR NR
Time to Oral Intake or First Flatus NS NS NR NS
Morbidity NS ↓ NC NS NS NS NS NS
Pulmonary complications ↓ NC ↓ NC NR NS 0% NS ↓ NC
Mortality 0% NC 0% NC 0% NC 0% NC 0% NC About 0% NS 0% NC NS
Length of Stay NS NS NR NS
Mean number of lymph nodes ↓4.7-NS NS ↓6.3 - NS NS ↓6.1 P < 0.01 NR NS ↓3.3 - NS
5-yr survival NR NR NR 100% NC NS NR NR NS

Upward arrow (↑): increased or more in the laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) group compared to the open distal gastrectomy (ODG) group; Downward arrow (↓): decreased or less in the LADG group compared to the ODG group. B-I: Billroth I; B-II: Billroth II; R-Y: Roux-en-Y; NS: Not significant; NR: Not reported; NC: Not computed; LADG: Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy; ODG: Open distal gastrectomy.