Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 4;11(4):101–119. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v11i4.17

Table 1.

Sensitivity analyses of efficacy of DCQD in intestinal obstruction

Number of studies Number of subjects RR 95% CI I2 value NNT 95% CI
All studies# 6 361 1.13 0.97 to 1.31 58% N/A N/A
Risk of bias of trials
Moderate 5 301 1.14 0.95 to 1.39 66% N/A N/A
High 1 60 1.08 0.88 to 1.32 N/A N/A N/A
Route of administration
Via oral 4 231 1.08 0.84 to 1.39 67% N/A N/A
Via rectal 2 130 1.22 0.93 to 1.59 70% N/A N/A
Definition of response to therapy
Clinical alone 4 301 1.07 0.91 to 1.25 65% N/A N/A
Clinical + Imaging 2 60 1.45 1.11 to 1.91 0% 3.2 2 to 7.7
Aetiology
Postoperative 3 190 1.15 1.01 to 1.31 35% 7.7 4.2 to 50
Non-postoperative 3 171 1.11 0.72 to 1.73 78% N/A N/A

N/A, not applicable;

#

refers to the studies dichotomous data can be extracted from.