Table 1.
Treatment | Coded variablea | Process variableb | ||||
X1 | X2 | X3 | X1 | X2 | X3 | |
1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 10 | 1:6 | 140 |
2 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 10 | 1:6 | 160 |
3 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 10 | 1:4 | 140 |
4 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 10 | 1:4 | 160 |
5 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 20 | 1:6 | 140 |
6 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 20 | 1:6 | 160 |
7 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 20 | 1:4 | 140 |
8 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 20 | 1:4 | 160 |
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1:5 | 150 |
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1:5 | 150 |
11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1:5 | 150 |
12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 1:5 | 150 |
13 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1:5 | 150 |
14 | +2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 1:5 | 150 |
15 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 15 | 1:7 | 150 |
16 | 0 | +2 | 0 | 15 | 1:3 | 150 |
17 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 15 | 1:5 | 130 |
18 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 15 | 1:5 | 170 |
Coded level of variables: + = upper level, − = lower level and 0 = center points
X1, X2 and X3 were gum arabic concentration (%), the ratio of core material to wall material (w/w), and outlet temperature (°C), respectively.