Table 1.
(Antimicrobial activities of ink extract (IE) and / or amphotericin B (AMB) against Aspergillus fumigatus:)
| Concentration gradient (µg ml−1) | Spore germination (%) | |||
| A | B | C | Effect | |
| 0 (Control) | 100a±0.3 | 100a±0.8 | 100a±0.6 | - |
| 10 | 96b±0.6 | 87c±0.4 | 98a±1.2 | Antagonistic |
| 20 | 85b±0.1 | 73c±1.0 | 89a±1.0 | Antagonistic |
| 40 | 79b±0.5 | 62c±0.9 | 82a±0.9 | Antagonistic |
| 80 | 60b±0.2 | 36c±0.6 | 66a±0.5 | Antagonistic |
| 160 | 45b±0.1 | 0c±0.0 | 50a±1.0 | Antagonistic |
| 320 | 33b±0.4 | 0c±0.0 | 37a±0.2 | Antagonistic |
| 640 | 0b±0.0 | 0b±0.0 | 32a±0.1 | Antagonistic |
| 1280 | 0a±0.0 | 0a±0.0 | 0a±0.0 | indifferent |
A: Spore germination percentage that occurred of IE. B: Spore germination percentage that occurred of AMB. C: Spore germination percentage that occurred when IE and AMB are used together (1:1).Data are presented as mean × SEM (n=3 in each group).The means followed by same letter in the same raw are not significantly different according to ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range tests.