Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 6;3(3):92–100. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v3.i3.92

Table 7.

Comparison of different Studies evaluating adrenal gland endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration

Ref. Year Number of patients Patient population EUS-FNA Left adrenal, n Patient population EUS-FNA Left adrenal, n EUS-FNA Right adrenal, n Benign EUS-FNA cytology, n Malignant EUS-FNA cytology (n) Non-Diagnostic rate Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV F/U for benign lesions Method for F/U
Current research 2014 94 Patients undergoing EUS-FNA of either adrenal 94 Patients undergoing EUS-FNA of either adrenal 90 5 60 25 10% 86% 97% 96% 89% Available on 36/60 CT/MRI, repeat EUS at ≥ 6 mo or surgical pathology from adrenalectomy
1Uemura et al[13] 2013 150 Potentially resectable lung cancer 150 Potentially resectable lung cancer 91 51 7 4 0% 100% 100% 100% 100% Available in 4/7 F/U CT at 6 months
Schuurbiers et al[17] 2011 85 Lung cancer 150 Lung cancer 85 0 25 55 6% 86% 96% 91% 70% Available in 23/30 Clinical (n = 11) or F/U CT (n = 10)2
Eloubeidi et al[12] 2010 59 Known or suspected malignancy 59 Known or suspected malignancy 54 5 37 22 0% NR NR NR NR Clinical F/U for 37 Not part of study protocol
Bodtger et al[4] 2009 40 Known or suspected lung cancer 40 Known or suspected lung cancer 40 0 29 11 0% 94% 43% 91% 55% Available Survival at 2 yr
1

EUS-FNA was done in 11 patients, 3 had bilateral EUS-FNA;

2

Two patients had CT at 3 mo. EUS-FNA: Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value; FNA: Fine-needle aspiration; F/U: Follow up; N/A: Not available; NR: Not reported; CT: Computerized Tomography.