Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 21;7(4):472–478. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2014.05.006

Table 2.

Patients Treated with 90Y Microspheres and Gemcitabine

Radiation Dose Gy Gemcitabine Dose mg/m2 Diagnosis Number of Lesions Vascular Involvement Overall Survival Months Time to Local Failure Best Response (RECIST)
1 99.3 200 Hepatocellular 8 No 6.9 6.9 CR
2A§ 80.2 200 Hepatocellular 4 No 32.9 16.8 PR
2B§ 155.0 200 Hepatocellular 4 No 17.9 PR
3 85.3 200 Hepatocellular 2 Yes 12.3 9.9 PR
4 115.7 400 Hepatocellular 1 No 21.1 3.8 PD
5 130.0 200 Hepatocellular 5 No 12.5 7.1 SD
6A§ 97.4 200 Melanoma 8 No 27.7 6.4 PR
6B§ 134.5 200 Melanoma > 10 No 7.8 PR
7 102.4 200 Melanoma > 10 No 5.0 1.6 PR
8 89.0 200 Melanoma > 10 No 6.6 3.4 PD
9A§ 103.7 200 Melanoma > 10 No 9.2 6.8 SD
9B§ 109.8 200 Melanoma > 10 No 4.9 PD
10 85.7 200 Melanoma > 10 No 15.9 9.3 SD
11 124.4 200 Cholangio > 10 No 2.2 2.2 PD
12 110.2 400 Cholangio > 10 Yes 5.5 6.4 PD
13 92.7 200 Carcinoid > 10 No 10.4 10.4 SD

Alive at time of analysis.

Lost to follow up.

No local progression at time of death.

§

Treated to separate regions at different times.

Calculated dose to lobe.