TABLE 3—

Logistic Regression Results for Condom Use Among Black Male Youths: Focus on the Future Intervention, Louisiana and North Carolina, 2010–2012

CCU Predictor Variable	EOR (95% CI)	P
Model 1, 2-mo follow-up
Assigned to intervention group	1.39 (0.90, 2.13)	.14
Baseline CCU	4.15 (2.36, 7.31)	< .001
Age	0.84 (0.75, 0.95)	.006
Ever diagnosed with chlamydia/gonorrhea	1.14 (0.73, 1.79)	.56
Model 2, 6-mo follow-up
Assigned to intervention group	1.63 (1.07, 2.49)	.02
Baseline CCU	5.07 (2.96, 8.71)	< .001
Age	0.87 (0.78, 0.98)	.017
Ever diagnosed with chlamydia/gonorrhea	0.86 (0.56, 1.32)	.48
Model 3, combined 2- and 6-mo follow-ups
Assigned to intervention group	1.49 (1.06, 2.08)	.02
Baseline CCU	4.55 (2.91, 7.09)	< .001
Age	0.86 (0.79, 0.94)	.001
Ever diagnosed with chlamydia/gonorrhea	1.00 (0.71, 1.41)	.99

Note. CCU = correct and consistent use; CI = confidence interval; EOR = estimated odds ratio.