Table 1. Characteristics and main results of the selected randomized clinical trials, GRADEa score and clinical relevance score. (N = 20).
Source/Country in which the study was conducted /Substance studied/Sample size | Type of intervention/Method to minimize abandonment/Non-adherence rate | Outcome measured | GRADE totalb – Clinical relevancec |
---|---|---|---|
Agyapong et al (2012)1 | SMS/control Not used 7.4% in 3 months | Text messaging support showed improvement in outcomes for patients with depression and comorbidity (alcohol dependence). | 5/5-5/5 |
Ireland | |||
Alcohol | |||
N = 54 | |||
Blankers M et al (2011)5 | Cognitive behavioral therapy and motivational interviewing online/internet Motivational e-mails, telephone calls to collect data, 15 Euro voucher for every questionnaire completed 41.0% in 6 months | Reducing the number of units of alcohol per week in 6 months. | 4/5-5/5 |
Holland | |||
Alcohol | |||
N = 205 | |||
Joseph A et al (2011)28 | Prevalence of relapse and telephone /usual care Not used 8.4% in 18 months | The approach increased short tobacco abstinence in the and long term. | 5/5-5/5 |
United States | |||
Tobacco | |||
N = 443 | |||
McKay J et al (2011)34 | Counselling and telephone monitoring/ telephone monitoring/usual treatment Not used 26.2% in 24 months | Telephone monitoring and counseling decreased % of days of alcohol consumption up to 18 months of intervention. | 5/5-5/5 |
United States | |||
Alcohol | |||
N = 252 | |||
Postel M et al (2011)38 | Internet/waiting list Not used Non-adherence rate not estimated | Gender, educational level, age, initial intake and motivational level were predictors of | 1/5-2/5 |
Holland | |||
Alcohol | |||
N = 924 | |||
Whittaker R et al (2011)48 | Video message/control Not used 27.0% in 6 months | Efficacy not shown in the tested intervention. Dropout rates were high in both groups. | 5/5-3/5 |
New Zealand | |||
Tobacco | |||
N = 226 | |||
Fernandes S et al (2010)18 | Brief, motivational telephone interview/telephone control Not used 68.8% in 6 months | Positive efficacy for stopping marijuana use. | 2/5-3/5 |
Brazil | |||
Marijuana | |||
N = 1.744 | |||
Girard B et al (2010)20 | Virtual game Not used 60.4% in 6 months | E-cigarettes led to a significant reduction in nicotine dependence, abstinence and dropout rates. | 5/5-4/5 |
Canada | |||
Tobacco | |||
N = 91 | |||
Zanjani F et al (2010)49 | Brief motivational telephone interview/usual care Participants in the intervention group received a letter to reinforce presence in the continued treatment using motivational components. 22.1% in 6 months | The proposed intervention did not lead to a significant improvement in the results of psychiatric health. | 3/5-5/5 |
United States | |||
Tobacco | |||
N = 113 | |||
Eberhard S et al (2009)15 | Motivational telephone interview (1 session-15 min.) Intervention group received feedback at the beginning 12.5% in 6 months | Alcohol consumption reduced to safe levels. | 1/5-2/5 |
Sweden | |||
Alcohol | |||
N = 344 | |||
Kavanagh D & Connolly J (2009)30 | Letter and telephone: immediate treatment/delayed treatment Not used 52.9% in 12 months | High levels of adherence to treatment and substantial reduction of alcohol use. | 5/5-4/5 |
Australia | |||
Alcohol | |||
N = 204 | |||
Kay-Lambkin F et al (2009)31 | Computerized cognitive behavioral therapy/brief intervention Not used 28.9% in 12 months | Marijuana use and hazardous use of substances reduced with computerized therapy. | 4/5-5/5 |
Australia | |||
Alcohol and marijuana | |||
N = 97 | |||
Litt M et al (2009)33 | Individual treatment program (cell phone)/package of cognitive-behavioral therapy Not used 15.5% in 16 weeks | Intervention decreased the days of alcohol intake and increased use of coping strategies. | 1/5-2/5 |
United States | |||
Alcohol and marijuana | |||
N = 110 | |||
Brendryen H et al (2008)6 | Messages via Internet, e-mail and cellular (SMS) (I) X Self-help booklet (C) The proposed intervention already included the method of minimization of abandonment 32.6% in 12 months | Better rates of abstinence from tobacco. | 5/5-5/5 |
Norway | |||
Tobacco | |||
N = 290 | |||
El-Khorazaty M et al (2007)16 | Educational intervention and multimodal integrative counseling /usual care Telephone contacts, current contact information, financial incentives, training of staff in the recruitment and implementation of the study, salary support for staff, quick resolution to the problems that the team could have, continuous monitoring of the study 20.0% in 9 months | Specific recruitment and retention strategies increased the rate of minority participation in trials. | 2/5-2/5 |
United States | |||
Polydrug | |||
N = 1.070 | |||
Hubbard R et al (2007)26 | Telephone group/standard care group Both groups were reminded to enroll in outpatient and continuing care following; reminded of the dates of the calls (I) Not used 29.2% in 13 weeks | Well-developed telephone approaches facilitate the approaches between professional and patient. | 4/5-5/5 |
United States | |||
Polydrug | |||
N = 339 | |||
Parker D et al (2007)37 | Motivational interview (telephone), incentives, self-help material/incentives and self-help material/self-help material Joining a monetary incentive program (30 days of abstinence confirmed by screening) 30.7% in 6 months (postpartum) | Telephone counseling was well received by pregnant low-income women. The cessation rate was higher among those who received the intervention. | 2/5-4/5 |
United States | |||
Tobacco | |||
N = 1.065 | |||
Vidrine D et al (2006)47 | Telephone/standard care Not used 18.9% in 3 months | Intervention by phone showed greater reduction in anxiety and depression, and increased self-efficacy. | 1/5-2/5 |
United States | |||
Tobacco | |||
N = 95 | |||
Currie S et al (2004)11 | Individual face-to-face treatment (I) X self-help/telephone support (C) Not used 36.0% X 50.0% in 6 months | Better sleep parameters for both groups and equal levels of lapse and relapse to alcohol. | 1/5-2/5 |
Canada | |||
Alcohol | |||
N = 57 | |||
Hall J & Hubert D (2000)23 | Case management/interactive voice response system/control Not used Non-adherence rate not estimated | The use of telemedicine facilitated interaction with customers and decreased costs. | 0/5-1/5 |
United States | |||
Polydrug | |||
N = 230 |
I: Intervention Group; C: Control Group
a GRADE study quality scale, Guyatt GH et al (2008).
b The complete data for the scale are described in Table 3.
c The complete data for the scale are described in Table 4.