Skip to main content
. 2014 Aug 15;7(9):5855–5863.

Table 1.

Main characteristics and results of studies evaluating the MVD and survival

First author Year Patients source Study design N Blinded reading Readers (n) Mode of reading Follow-up (years) Anti-body Cut-off HR estimation Survival analysis Results
Iakovlev [36] 2012 Canada Retro. 57 Yes ? Automated 3.25 CD34 Median ND DFS Negative
Ren [35] 2011 China Retro. 128 Yes 2 Optical ? CD34 Median HR OS Negative
Yao a [34] 2007 China Retro. 78 ? ? Automated ? CD31 Median HR OS Negative
Yao b [34] 2007 China Retro. 78 ? ? Automated ? CD34 Median HR OS Negative
Kawata [33] 2004 Japan Retro. 17 ? ? Automated 3.17 FVIII Median RR OS Negative
Yagasaki [32] 2003 Japan Retro. 84 ? ? Optical 2.75 CD105 Median HR OS Negative
Sabo [17] 2001 Israel Retro. 49 ? ? Automated ? CD34 > 10% ND OS Negative
Song [31] 2001 Korea Retro. 50 ? 2 Optical 8 CD31 > 10 vessels Surv. curves OS Positive
Yoshino [30] 2000 Japan Retro. 96 Yes 2 Optical > 5 FVIII Median ND OS Positive
Nativ [20] 1998 Israel Retro. 36 ? ? Optical 8.1 FVIII Median Events OS Positive
Yoshino [29] 1998 Japan Retro. 62 ? ? Optical ? FVIII Median Events OS Positive
Gelb [28] 1997 USA Retro. 52 ? ? Optical 9.08 FVIII Median ND OS Negative
Imazano [27] 1997 Japan Retro. 133 ? ? ? 3.33 FVIII ? HR OS Negative
Delahunt [26] 1997 New Zealand Retro. 150 ? 3 Optical ? FVIII > 40 vessels/HPF ND OS Negative
Yoshino [21] 1995 Japan Retro. 45 Yes ? Optical 2.17 FVIII Median Events OS, DFS (ND) Positive

MVD, micro vessel density; Retro, retrospective study; HPF, high power field; HR, hazard ratio; ND, no data; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; Positive MVD, being significantly unfavorable prognostic factor for overall survival; Negative MVD, being significantly favorable or no significant prognostic factor for overall survival.