Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Nov 15;70(22):2004–2017. doi: 10.2146/ajhp130119

Table 2.

Proposal for Precise Biosimilar Terminology9

Term(s) Definition Implications
Biosimilar Copy version of an
already authorized
biological medicinal
product with
demonstrated similarity
in physicochemical
characteristics, efficacy
and safety, based on a
comprehensive
comparability exercise.
Only very small differences
between biosimilar and
reference with reassurance that
these are of no clinical
relevance.

Extrapolation of clinical
indications acceptable if
scientifically justified.
Me-too biological/biologic

Noninnovator
biological/biologic
Biological medicinal
product developed on its
own and not directly
compared and analyzed
against a licensed
reference biological.
May or may not have
been compared
clinically.
Unknown whether and which
physicochemical differences
exist compared to other
biological of the same product
class.

Clinical comparison alone
usually not sensitive enough to
pick up differences of potential
relevance. Therefore,
extrapolation of clinical
indications problematic.
Second-generation (next-generation)
biological/biologic

Biobetter
Biological that has been
structurally and/or
functionally altered to
achieve an improved or
different clinical
performance.
Usually stand-alone
developments with a full
development program.

Clear (and intended)
differences in the structure of
the active substance, and most
probably different clinical
behavior due to, for example,
different potency or
immunogenicity.

From a regulatory perspective,
a claim for “better” would have
to be substantiated by data
showing a clinically relevant
advantage over a first- or
previous-generation product.