Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anim Behav. 2014 Sep 29;97:95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.09.002

Table 2.

Comparison of responsiveness between fathers and mothers with independent infants to the different stimulus tests

Males Females
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) U P Cohen's d
OV Latency 569.3 (75.11) 600.0 -- 15.0 0.699 −0.547
Frequency 300.5 (97.2) 225.6 (105.0) 13.0 0.484 0.317
Time 101.0 (127.7) 117.3 (202.1) 18.0 1.000 −0.096
UV Latency 600.0 -- 600.0 -- -- -- --
Frequency 202.5 (132.5) 139.3 (70.4) 12.0 0.393 0.288
Time 112.8 (125.7) 101.5 (230.6) 16.5 0.818 0.060
OO Latency 586.1 (33.8) 600.0 -- 15.0 0.699 −0.247
Frequency 69.0 (71.7) 72.1 (64.7) 15.0 0.699 −0.039
Time 97.1 (188.5) 108 (230.6) 18.0 1.000 −0.051
UO Latency 600.0 -- 600.0 -- -- -- --
Frequency 64.1 (46.5) 54.1 (42.9) 9.50 0.179 0.577
Time 34.6 (84.9) 124.8 (169.3) 18.0 0.588 −0.673

Stimuli were own infant vocalization (OV), unfamiliar infant vocalization (UV), own infant odour (OO) and unfamiliar infant odour (UO). Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare responses between the sexes. Cohen's d for effect size in comparison of two means is reported. All Ps two tailed. Latency= latency of stimulus exploratory behaviour. Frequency= frequency of investigatory behaviour (the combined frequency of stimulus oriented, stimulus exploratory, enter bridge, enter stimulus cage and enter stimulus nestbox). Time= time spent near the stimulus (the combined time in the bridge, stimulus chamber and stimulus nestbox).