Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anim Behav. 2014 Sep 29;97:95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.09.002

Table 6.

Comparisons of responsiveness of current breeders with dependent and independent infants and noncurrent breeders (no infants) across the vocal tests

Test Dependent vs independent infants Dependent infants vs no infants Independent infants vs no infants
UV OV UV UV*
T P Cohen's d T P Cohen's d U P Cohen's d U P Cohen's d
Latency to orient to stimulus 0.0 0.002 −0.624 0.0 0.002 −0.905 23.5 0.003 −0.633 47 0.15 −0.077
Latency to explore stimulus 0.0 0.007 −1.500 0.0 0.027 −0.400 18 0.001 −2.12 -- -- --
Latency to enter stimulus nestbox 0.0 0.027 −0.880 0.0 0.027 −0.880 36 0.038 −1.245 -- -- --
Frequency of investigatory behaviour 0.0 0.001 1.352 0.0 0.001 1.998 38 0.051 0.900 39 0.059 1.16
Time spent near stimulus 0.0 0.003 1.381 3.0 0.012 0.863 12.5 0.001 1.953 57 0.409 0.590

Stimuli were own infant vocalization (OV) and unfamiliar infant vocalization (UV). Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests were used to test between different conditions in the same parents (T) and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare responses between different parents (U). Effect size measure Cohen's d for two comparison of two means is reported. Significant P values are shown in bold. Also see Figs 3, 4.

*

When the behaviour did not occur in any of the compared breeding conditions the statistical comparison was not performed.