Table 6.
Test | Dependent vs independent infants | Dependent infants vs no infants | Independent infants vs no infants | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UV | OV | UV | UV* | |||||||||
T | P | Cohen's d | T | P | Cohen's d | U | P | Cohen's d | U | P | Cohen's d | |
Latency to orient to stimulus | 0.0 | 0.002 | −0.624 | 0.0 | 0.002 | −0.905 | 23.5 | 0.003 | −0.633 | 47 | 0.15 | −0.077 |
Latency to explore stimulus | 0.0 | 0.007 | −1.500 | 0.0 | 0.027 | −0.400 | 18 | 0.001 | −2.12 | -- | -- | -- |
Latency to enter stimulus nestbox | 0.0 | 0.027 | −0.880 | 0.0 | 0.027 | −0.880 | 36 | 0.038 | −1.245 | -- | -- | -- |
Frequency of investigatory behaviour | 0.0 | 0.001 | 1.352 | 0.0 | 0.001 | 1.998 | 38 | 0.051 | 0.900 | 39 | 0.059 | 1.16 |
Time spent near stimulus | 0.0 | 0.003 | 1.381 | 3.0 | 0.012 | 0.863 | 12.5 | 0.001 | 1.953 | 57 | 0.409 | 0.590 |
Stimuli were own infant vocalization (OV) and unfamiliar infant vocalization (UV). Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests were used to test between different conditions in the same parents (T) and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare responses between different parents (U). Effect size measure Cohen's d for two comparison of two means is reported. Significant P values are shown in bold. Also see Figs 3, 4.
When the behaviour did not occur in any of the compared breeding conditions the statistical comparison was not performed.