Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 13.
Published in final edited form as: LGBT Health. 2014 Mar 13;1(2):93–97. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2013.0047

TABLE 2.

Correlates of Favoring Encouragement of PrEP Use and Interest in Using PrEP: Sexually Active MSM Recruited from Gay Pride Events, New York City, June 2011

In Favor of Encouraging PrEP Use Total, No. (%)a Not in Favor of Encouraging PrEP Use Total, No. (%)a Don't Know Whether They are in Favor of Encouraging PrEP Use Total, No. (%)a P Likely to Use PrEP Total, No. (%)ab Not Likely to Use PrEP Total, No. (%)ab Don't Know Whether They are Likely to Use PrEP Total, No. (%)ab P
Total 277 (58.4%) 43 (9.1%) 154 (32.5%) 205 (50.9%) 141 (35.0%) 57 (14.1%)

Mode of survey administration .001 .000
 Self 157 (52.5) 28 (9.4) 114 (38.1) 119 (45.6) 93 (35.6) 49 (18.8)
 Interviewer 107 (69.9) 13 (8.5) 33 (21.6) 78 (60.5) 45 (34.9) 6 (4.7)

Race/ethnicity .029 .000
 African American/Black 28 (58.3) 4 (8.3) 16 (33.3) 26 (66.7) 11 (28.2) 1 (5.1)
 Latino 68 (70.8) 8 (8.3) 20 (20.8) 54 (72.0) 11 (14.7) 10 (13.3)
 White 125 (52.3) 20 (8.4) 94 (39.3) 80 (38.1) 96 (45.7) 34 (16.2)
 Other 53 (60.9) 11 (12.6) 23 (26.4) 43 (57.3) 23 (30.7) 9 (12.0)

HIV status .023
 Negative 245 (56.6) 40 (9.2) 148 (34.2) 205 (50.9) 141 (35.0) 57 (14.1)
 Positive 32 (78.0) 3 (7.3) 6 (14.6) n.a. n.a. n.a.

Perceived risk of HIVb .103 .000
 No risk 64 (62.7) 9 (8.8) 29 (28.4) 47 (46.5) 42 (41.6) 12 (11.9)
 Low risk 144 (52.0) 27 (9.7) 106 (38.3) 119 (46.7) 95 (37.3) 41 (16.1)
 High risk 33 (70.2) 3 (6.4) 11 (23.4) 35 (81.4) 4 (9.3) 4 (9.3)

Ever heard of PrEP .206 .651
 Yes 115 (63.2) 16 (8.8) 51 (28.0) 75 (53.2) 49 (34.8) 17 (12.1)
 No 160 (55.4) 26 (9.0) 103 (35.6) 128 (49.4) 92 (35.5) 39 (15.1)

PrEP only taken before sex .000 .000
 True 67 (76.1) 11 (12.5) 10 (11.4) 51 (68.0) 14 (18.7) 10 (13.3)
 False 124 (70.1) 17 (9.6) 36 (20.3) 80 (51.6) 59 (38.1) 16 (10.3)
 Don't know 66 (40.2) 15 (9.1) 83 (50.6) 63 (39.9) 65 (41.1) 13 (19.0)

Side effects of PrEP .000 .000
 Has a lot of side effects 24 (40.0) 15 (25.0) 21 (35.0) 15 (27.8) 35 (64.8) 4 (7.4)
 Has a few side effects 136 (71.2) 17 (8.9) 38 (19.9) 105 (63.3) 46 (27.7) 15 (9.0)
 Has no side effects 11 (91.7) 1 (8.3) 0 (0.0) 7 (63.6) 3 (27.3) 1 (9.1)
 Don't know 95 (52.5) 10 (5.5) 76 (42.0) 77 (45.0) 57 (33.3) 37 (21.6)

Protection offered by PrEP against HIV infection .000 .000
 75%–100% protection 118 (79.7) 16 (10.8) 14 (9.5) 85 (68.5) 33 (26.6) 6 (4.8)
 At least 50%-protection 50 (66.7) 7 (9.3) 18 (24.0) 39 (57.4) 20 (29.4) 9 (13.2)
 Less than 50% protection 22 (42.3) 13 (25.0) 17 (32.7) 19 (38.8) 25 (51.0) 5 (10.2)
 Don't know 76 (45.8) 6 (3.6) 84 (50.6) 60 (38.0) 62 (39.2) 36 (22.8)

How many of your friends would use PrEP if made available .000 .000
 All or most 120 (76.4) 10 (6.4) 27 (17.2) 114 (78.1) 23 (15.8) 9 (6.2)
 Some or a few 110 (56.1) 24 (12.2) 62 (31.6) 68 (38.9) 83 (47.4) 24 (13.7)
 None 13 (44.8) 5 (17.2) 11 (37.9) 8 (32.0) 11 (44.0) 6 (24.0)
 Don't know 26 (40.6) 3 (4.7) 35 (54.7) 14 (25.0) 24 (42.9) 18 (32.1)

Would gay men stop using condoms if PrEP becomes available .017 .041
 Gay men would continue using condoms 89 (66.9) 9 (6.8) 35 (26.3) 71 (58.2) 32 (26.2) 19 (15.6)
 Gay men would stop using condoms 113 (56.5) 28 (14.0) 59 (29.5) 88 (48.9) 74 (41.1) 18 (10.0)
 Don't know 67 (59.3) 5 (4.4) 41 (36.3) 46 (46.9) 34 (34.7) 18 (18.4)
a

Due to missing data, the total number is some categories is <480.

b

Men who reported being HIV-positive were excluded from these analyses.