Skip to main content
. 2013 May;2(2):63–68. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2013.v2.2.63

Table 2. Characteristics of the reported cases in our review.

(a)
Items OMS (−) OMS (+) Total
Luminal communication with bile duct (−) 46 (39.3) 28 (23.9) 74 (63.2)
Luminal communication with bile duct (+) (main duct type) 33 (28.2) 2 (1.7) 35 (29.9)
Luminal communication with bile duct (+) (branch duct type) 6 (5.1) 2 (1.7) 8 (6.8)
Total 85 (72.7) 32 (27.4) 117 (100)
(b)
Items OMS (−) OMS (+)
Luminal communication with bile duct (−)
  Female 31/46 (67.4) 28/28 (100)
  Male 15/46 (32.6) 0/28 (0)
  Adenocarcinoma 29/46 (63.0) 2/28 (7.1)
  Adenoma 17/46 (37.0) 26/28 (92.9)
Luminal communication with bile duct (+)
  Female 21/39 (53.8) 4/4 (100)
  Male 18/39 (46.2) 0/4 (0)
  Adenocarcinoma 28/39 (71.8) 1/4 (25)
  Adenoma 11/39 (28.2) 3/4 (75)

Values in parentheses are percentages. OMS, ovarian mesenchymal stroma. The main biliary duct was defined as the primary and secondary branches of the biliary tree.