Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD006534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006534.pub2

Comparison 2. Failure to respond (1‐4 weeks).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Citalopram versus TCAs 4 751 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.95 [0.46, 1.98]
1.1 versus Amitriptyline 3 476 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.33 [0.76, 2.31]
1.2 versus Imipramine 1 275 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.45 [0.24, 0.86]
2 Citalopram versus other SSRIs 4   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Versus Escitalopram 1 143 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.46 [0.75, 2.82]
2.2 Versus Fluoxetine 2 416 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.34, 2.34]
2.3 Versus Sertraline 2 245 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.14 [0.60, 2.15]
3 Citalopram versus other conventional antidepressants 2   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 versus Reboxetine 2 458 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.27, 2.75]