Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD006534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006534.pub2

Comparison 3. Failure to respond (16‐24 weeks).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Citalopram versus TCAs 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 versus Imipramine 1 472 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.09 [0.69, 1.72]
2 Citalopram versus other SSRIs 2   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Versus Escitalopram 1 357 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.64, 1.68]
2.2 Versus Sertraline 1 400 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.45, 1.17]
3 Citalopram versus SNRIs 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Versus Venlafaxine XR 1 151 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.44, 1.82]
4 Citalopram versus other conventional antidepressants 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 versus Reboxetine 1 357 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.46 [0.30, 0.70]