Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD006534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006534.pub2

Comparison 19. SE ‐ Appetite increased.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Citalopram versus heterocyclics 1 96 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.06, 16.46]
1.1 versus Maprotiline 1 96 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.06, 16.46]
2 Citalopram versus other conventional ADs 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 versus Mirtazapine 1 270 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.16 [0.03, 0.72]