Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD006534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006534.pub2

Comparison 42. SE ‐ Fatigue.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Citalopram versus TCAs 1 365 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.55 [0.20, 1.53]
1.1 versus Amitriptyline 1 365 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.55 [0.20, 1.53]
2 Citalopram versus heterocyclics 1 336 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.21 [0.06, 0.76]
2.1 versus Mianserin 1 336 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.21 [0.06, 0.76]
3 Citalopram versus other SSRIs 2   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Versus Escitalopram 2 467 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.31 [0.12, 0.84]
4 Citalopram versus other conventional ADs 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 versus Mirtazapine 1 270 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.10 [0.54, 2.25]