Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD006534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006534.pub2

Comparison 45. SE ‐ Gastrointestinal.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Citalopram versus TCAs 3 146 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.28, 2.15]
1.1 versus Amitriptyline 2 103 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.45 [0.10, 2.07]
1.2 versus Imipramine 1 43 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.2 [0.30, 4.74]
2 Citalopram versus other SSRIs 3   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 Versus Escitalopram 2 375 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.14 [0.54, 2.40]
2.2 Versus Sertraline 2 545 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.30, 1.30]
3 Citalopram versus MAOIs or newer ADs 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 versus Moclobemide 1 42 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.13 [0.28, 4.47]
4 Citalopram versus non‐conventional ADs 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 versus Hypericum (St. John's wort) 1 258 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.41 [1.12, 5.18]