Comparison 61. SE ‐ Nausea/vomiting.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Citalopram versus TCAs	6	1027	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.78 [0.96, 3.30]
1.1 versus Amitriptyline	3	477	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	2.44 [1.27, 4.66]
1.2 versus Imipramine	2	515	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.98 [0.55, 1.73]
1.3 versus Nortriptyline	1	35	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	7.11 [1.23, 40.98]
2 Citalopram versus heterocyclics	2	432	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	2.82 [0.60, 13.23]
2.1 versus Maprotiline	1	96	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	12.26 [0.66, 228.27]
2.2 versus Mianserin	1	336	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.88 [0.89, 3.97]
3 Citalopram versus other SSRIs	12		Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
3.1 Versus Escitalopram	7	2055	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.92 [0.49, 1.74]
3.2 Versus Fluoxetine	3	732	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.46 [0.91, 2.35]
3.3 Versus Paroxetine	1	406	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.15 [0.67, 1.95]
3.4 Versus Sertraline	1	42	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.71 [0.14, 3.64]
4 Citalopram versus other conventional ADs	3		Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
4.1 versus Mirtazapine	1	270	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	2.24 [1.12, 4.49]
4.2 versus Reboxetine	2	458	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	3.46 [0.40, 29.92]