Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD006534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006534.pub2

Comparison 72. SE ‐ Sedation/drowsiness.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Citalopram versus TCAs 2 112 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.25 [0.09, 0.70]
1.1 versus Amitriptyline 2 112 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.25 [0.09, 0.70]
2 Citalopram versus heterocyclics 1 96 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.20, 1.90]
2.1 versus Maprotiline 1 96 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.20, 1.90]
3 Citalopram versus other SSRIs 3   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Versus Escitalopram 1 294 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.31 [0.01, 7.65]
3.2 Versus Fluoxetine 1 59 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.14, 7.90]
3.3 Versus Sertraline 1 400 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.36, 2.25]
4 Citalopram versus other conventional ADs 2   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 versus Mirtazapine 1 270 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.73 [0.29, 1.88]
4.2 versus Reboxetine 1 357 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.34, 2.41]