Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD006534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006534.pub2

Comparison 77. SE ‐ Sweating.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Citalopram versus TCAs 5 653 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.49 [0.31, 0.77]
1.1 versus Amitriptyline 2 103 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.41 [0.12, 1.49]
1.2 versus Imipramine 2 515 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.50 [0.30, 0.83]
1.3 versus Nortriptyline 1 35 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.56 [0.14, 2.21]
2 Citalopram versus heterocyclics 1 96 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.2 [0.62, 7.87]
2.1 versus Maprotiline 1 96 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.2 [0.62, 7.87]
3 Citalopram versus other SSRIs 6   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 Versus Escitalopram 3 859 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.83 [0.39, 1.78]
3.2 Versus Fluoxetine 1 316 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.08 [0.61, 15.49]
3.3 Versus Sertraline 2 442 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.32 [0.76, 2.27]
4 Citalopram versus other conventional ADs 2   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
4.1 versus Mirtazapine 1 270 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 7.91 [2.29, 27.29]
4.2 versus Reboxetine 1 357 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.38 [0.16, 0.90]