Comparison 79. SE ‐ Tachycardia.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Citalopram versus TCAs	2	515	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.36 [0.13, 0.99]
1.1 versus Imipramine	2	515	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.36 [0.13, 0.99]
2 Citalopram versus heterocyclics	1	96	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.57 [0.13, 2.55]
2.1 versus Maprotiline	1	96	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.57 [0.13, 2.55]
3 Citalopram versus other SSRIs	1		Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
3.1 versus Escitalopram	1	248	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.34 [0.01, 8.33]
4 Citalopram versus other conventional ADs	1		Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
4.1 versus Reboxetine	1	357	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.03 [0.20, 5.17]