Comparison 83. SE ‐ Urination problems.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Citalopram versus TCAs	3	138	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.26 [0.06, 1.12]
1.1 versus Amitriptyline	2	103	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.23 [0.04, 1.49]
1.2 versus Nortriptyline	1	35	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.31 [0.03, 3.34]
2 Citalopram versus heterocyclics	1	96	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.19 [0.01, 4.10]
2.1 versus Maprotiline	1	96	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.19 [0.01, 4.10]
3 Citalopram versus other SSRIs	1		Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
3.1 Versus Sertraline	1	400	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.52 [0.42, 5.45]
4 Citalopram versus other conventional ADs	2	458	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.18 [0.01, 5.61]
4.1 versus Reboxetine	2	458	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.18 [0.01, 5.61]