Comparison 86. SE ‐ Visual problems (accommodation disorders, blurred vision, detached retina, mydriasis).

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Citalopram versus TCAs	4	181	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.30 [0.13, 0.69]
1.1 versus Amitriptyline	2	103	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.14 [0.02, 0.82]
1.2 versus Imipramine	1	43	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.23 [0.06, 0.84]
1.3 versus Nortriptyline	1	35	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.65 [0.16, 2.68]
2 Citalopram versus heterocyclics	1	96	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	3.06 [0.12, 77.09]
2.1 versus Maprotiline	1	96	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	3.06 [0.12, 77.09]
3 Citalopram versus other SSRIs	2	694	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.62 [0.24, 1.63]
3.1 Versus Escitalopram	1	294	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	2.82 [0.11, 69.84]
3.2 Versus Sertraline	1	400	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.53 [0.19, 1.47]
4 Citalopram versus other conventional ADs	1	357	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.25 [0.03, 2.28]
4.1 versus Reboxetine	1	357	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.25 [0.03, 2.28]