Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD006534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006534.pub2

de Wilde 1985.

Methods Six‐week controlled, double‐blind, randomised trial.
Participants In‐patients suffering from endogenous depression or chronic dysthymic disorder (Spitzer's research Diagnostic Criteria), with a total score of at least 25 on the 10‐item Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale (CPRS) sub‐scale for depression.
Age range: 18‐70 years
Exclusion criteria: pregnancy/lactation, serious somatic disease (particularly of the heart, liver or kidneys), organic brain syndrome, need for ECT, abuse of alcohol or drugs, and treatment with MAO inhibitors within the previous 3 weeks.
Interventions Citalopram: 30 participants
Mianserin: 30 participants
Citalopram dose range: 40‐80 mg/die
Mianserin dose range:60‐120 mg/die
Additional medication with benzodiazepine as sedatives/hypnotics was permitted.
Outcomes Primary outcome: mean change at endpoint on the 10‐item CPRS sub‐scale for depression and on Clinical Global Impression ‐ Severity (CGI‐S).
Notes This study was funded by Lundbeck (citalopram manufacturer).
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: " Patients were randomly allocated". Probably done.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "double blind treatment with either citalopram or mianserin, administered as identically looking capsules".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Observed‐case (completers) analysis only
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk No reliable data about response rate.
Other bias Unclear risk Sponsorship bias cannot be ruled out.