Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;2012(7):CD006534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006534.pub2

Lu 10‐171, 83‐01.

Methods Six‐week, randomised, double‐blind study.
Participants In‐and outpatients of either sex, 18‐65 years old, who had given their informed consent to participate in the study, and who were suffering from a major depressive episode (DSM‐III classification) of a severity corresponding to a total score of at least 18 points on the HDRS‐17 items.
Exclusion criteria: concurrent somatic disease (particularly severe liver, heart or kidney disease); pregnancy or absence of use of an effective contraceptive method; a history of epilepsy, glaucoma, urinary retention, alcoholism, pyloric stenosis or symptomatic prostatic hypertrophy, marked mental subnormality, need of ECT or administration of ECT during the previous month, treatment with TCA in adequate dosage (100 mg/day of amitriptyline or equivalent) during the last month or with a MAO‐I during the last 2 weeks prior to entry into the study.
Interventions Citalopram: 23 participants.
Citalopram dose range: 20‐60 mg/day.
Imipramine: 22 participants.
Imipramine dose range: 50‐150 mg/day.
Outcomes Outcomes: Change from baseline to week 6 in HDRS‐17 items, Leeds self rating scale.
Notes This study was funded by Lundbeck.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "the randomization was made in block of 4 according to a code prepared by the Biostatistical Department of Lundbeck".
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information about allocation concealment.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "double blind study".
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information reported.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No information reported.
Other bias Unclear risk Sponsorship bias cannot be ruled out.