Evaluation of temporal consistency of the proposed reconstruction method by comparing temperature probe readings with PRF based temperature change values at the location of probe insertion reconstructed with fully-sampled data with 2 averages, fully-sampled data with 1 average, and undersampled data reconstructed by the proposed method with 1 average and R=3. Using the probe reading as the gold standard, the RMSEs of the three cases are respectively, 8.1%, 8.1%, and 7.8%.