Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2014 Apr 21;73(4):1420–1431. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25255

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Evaluation of temporal consistency of the proposed reconstruction method by comparing temperature probe readings with PRF based temperature change values at the location of probe insertion reconstructed with fully-sampled data with 2 averages, fully-sampled data with 1 average, and undersampled data reconstructed by the proposed method with 1 average and R=3. Using the probe reading as the gold standard, the RMSEs of the three cases are respectively, 8.1%, 8.1%, and 7.8%.