Figure 8.
Evaluation of temporal consistency of the proposed reconstruction method by comparing temperature probe readings with PRF based temperature change values at the location of probe insertion reconstructed with fully-sampled data with 2 averages, fully-sampled data with 1 average, and undersampled data reconstructed by the proposed method with 1 average and R=3. Using the probe reading as the gold standard, the RMSEs of the three cases are respectively, 8.1%, 8.1%, and 7.8%.