Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 22;34(43):14243–14251. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2283-14.2014

Table 1.

Tat-mediated increase in neuronal excitability is Tat specific and long lastinga

Cells with multiple APs/N Em (mV) Rheobase (pA) AP threshold (mV) AP height
Control 6/19 −50.6 ± 1.5 20 ± 5 −11.5 ± 2.7 77.7 ± 5.8
100 nm Tat 19/20* −49.2 ± 1.2 10 ± 2* −16.1 ± 1.2* 87.9 ± 3.8*
Inactivated 100 nm Tat 1/5 −50.2 ± 1.4 20 ± 6 −13.2 ± 1.4 71.7 ± 8.7
Tat 1/10 −48.9 ± 4.6 24 ± 3 −16.3 ± 1.3 51.9 ± 3.7
Tat+ 11/11* −52.5 ± 1.0 10 ± 0* −21.0 ± 0.8* 71.8 ± 2.4*

aWhole-cell patch-clamp experiments in current-clamp mode on neurons pretreated with 100 nm Tat for 17 to 48 h. These neurons fired a statistically significant higher number of multiple action potentials and at lower rheobase and action potential thresholds compared with controls. Neurons treated with heat-inactivated Tat were less excitable compared with Tat pretreated and as excitable as controls (untreated neurons). Neurons isolated from Tat+ mice were also more excitable than Tat mice neurons.

*p < 0.05 (paired t test).

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure