Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 16;46(4):339–347. doi: 10.4143/crt.2013.154

Table 1.

Characteristics of Korean mRCC patients

Characteristic No. (%)
Median age (range, yr) 58.1 (29-83)
Gender
 Male 80 (80)
 Female 20 (20)
Tumor histology
 Clear cell type 86 (86)
 Non-clear cell type 14 (14)
Any sarcomatoid features (n=84, nephrectomy cases)
 Yes 10 (10)
 No 74 (74)
Initial VEGFr-TKI therapy
 Sunitinib 73 (73)
 Sorafenib 17 (17)
 Pazopanib 10 (10)
No. of previous VEGFr-TKI therapies
 1 81 (81)
 ≥ 2 19 (19)
KPS
 100-90 22 (2)
 80-70 74 (74)
 60-50 4 (4)
Previous nephrectomy
 Yes 84 (84)
 No 16 (16)
Previous immunotherapy
 Yes 20 (20)
 No 80 (80)
No. of metastatic sites
 ≤ 1 16 (16)
 ≥ 2 84 (84)
Heng’s criteriaa)
 Favorable 8 (8)
 Intermediate 64 (64)
 Poor 23 (23)
 Not applicable 5 (5)

mRCC, metastatic renal cell carcinoma; VEGFr-TKI, vascular endothelial growth factorreceptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor; KPS, Karnofsky performance scale.

a)

Heng’s prognostic criteria: low KPS score < 80, low hemoglobin (< lower limit of normal), high corrected serum calcium concentration (> upperlimit of normal), high platelet count (> upper limit of normal), high neutrophil count (> upper limit of normal), time from diagnosis to treatment < 1 year. Categories are defined as favorable=0, intermediate=1-2, or poor=3-6 risk factors.