Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 16;7:1891–1899. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S67812

Table 4.

Multivariate regression analysis of progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma

Prognostic factors LGSC
HGSC
PFS
HR (95% CI)
P-value OS
HR (95% CI)
P-value PFS
HR (95% CI)
P-value OS
HR (95% CI)
P-value
Age
 <50 y 1.05 (0.59–2.1) 0.874 1.33 (0.57–2.10) 0.463 1.79 (0.63–4.67) 0.213 1.46 (0.83–3.12) 0.183
 ≥50 y
ECOG score
 0 1.24 (0.76–2.68) 0.745 1.12 (0.64–1.84) 0.682 1.52 (0.51–1.98) 0.465 1.56 (0.82–2.76) 0.160
 ≥1
FIGO stage
 I–II 2.78 (1.64–5.08) 0.016* 2.42 (1.24–4.08) 0.026* 3.68 (1.89–5.47) 0.006* 2.89 (1.54–4.68) 0.011*
 III–IV
Tumor size
 <10 cm 1.11 (0.78–1.53) 0.736 1.20 (0.72–1.56) 0.774 0.67 (0.27–1.32) 0.204 0.74 (0.35–1.48) 0.451
 ≥10 cm
Peritoneal cytology
 Negative 2.66 (1.80–4.62) 0.012* 1.74 (0.82–2.54) 0.257 1.43 (0.82–2.35) 0.564 1.24 (0.43–1.90) 0.712
 Positive
Residual disease
 ≤1 cm 3.89 (1.75–4.76) 0.003* 3.70 (1.56–5.76) <0.001* 3.23 (1.63–5.54) <0.001* 7.42 (2.68–11.67) <0.001*
 >1 cm

Note:

*

Difference reached statistical significance.

Abbreviations: LGSC, low-grade serous carcinoma; HGSC, high-grade serous carcinoma; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.