Table 2. Correlations between crevicular calprotecin levels and the variables evaluated in the study cohort (n = 40).
Variables | crevicular calprotectin conc. | crevicular calprotectin amount | ||
r | p-value | r | p-value | |
Demographic parameters | ||||
age | 0.03373 | 0.8363a | 0.2539 | 0.1138a |
gender | −0.07515 | 0.6449b | 0.2520 | 0.1167b |
Clinical parameters | ||||
Mean BI | 0.5503 | <0.01b | 0.6271 | <0.01b |
Mean PD | 0.5010 | <0.01b | 0.7246 | <0.01b |
Mean CAL | 0.5350 | <0.01b | 0.7659 | <0.01b |
CPT conc. in GCF | — | — | 0.7626 | <0.01a |
CPT amount in GCF | 0.7626 | <0.01a | — | — |
Correlation analysis was performed using aPearson's rank correlation analyses or bSpearman's rank correlation analyses.
Bold numbers indicate a statistically significant difference (p<0.01).
BI, bleeding index; PD, probing depth; CAL, clinical attachment loss; CPT Conc., calprotectin concentration; CPT amount, the amount of calprotectin; GCF, gingival crevicular fluid.