Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 22;9(10):e110846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110846

Figure 7. Smn deficiency in SMA type I axon terminals in vivo.

Figure 7

(A, B) Representative motor endplates from E18 Smn+/+; SMN2tg and Smn−/−; SMN2tg Diaphragm stained against Smn and SynPhys. Acetylcholine receptors (AChR) and postsynaptic nuclei were visualized by ω-BTX and DAPI, respectively (scale bar: 5 µm). In (A) Smn deficiency is visible by highly reduced immunoreactive signals, as highlighted in the white box, whereas in (B) the number of Smn particles per NMJ is decreased in SMA type I motor endplates, as indicated by white arrowheads. (A, B) In SMA type I axon terminals (n = 3, N = 32) mean Smn signal intensity was significantly reduced (0.43±0.09, P = 0.0220, t = 6.629, DF = 2) in comparison to control motor endplates (set as ‘1’, n = 3, N = 43), whereas SynPhys signals (Smn−/−; SMN2tg 1.15±0.19, P = 0.5221, t = 0.7694, DF = 2) and the size of the presynaptic compartment (Control 49.48±13.94 µm2; Smn−/−; SMN2tg 36.56±7.464; P = 0.4596, t = 0.8174, DF = 4) were comparable. (C) Representative images from E18 Smn+/+; SMN2tg and Smn−/−; SMN2tg spinal cord cross sections immunolabeled with Smn and ChAT. Quantitative analysis revealed a significant decrease in cytosolic Smn immunoreactivity in SMA type I motoneurons in comparison to Smn+/+; SMN2tg cells (Smn+/+; SMN2tg set as ‘1’, n = 6, N = 107; Smn−/−; SMN2tg 0.46±0.05, n = 6, N = 85; P<0.0001, t = 11.23, DF = 5). ChAT signal intensity was not statistically affected (Smn−/−; SMN2tg 0.83±0.21; P = 0.4638, t = 0.7928, DF = 5). (D) Representative Western Blot with cytosolic and nuclear fractions from E18 control and Smn−/−; SMN2tg spinal cord extracts. Histone H3 and α tubulin were used as markers for nuclear and cytosolic fractions, respectively, and as standardization proteins for quantitative analysis. In SMA type I spinal cord extracts cytosolic and nuclear Smn were significantly reduced by 64% (0.36±0.08, N = 10, P<0.0001, t = 8.480, DF = 9) and 86% (0.14±0.03, N = 10, P<0.0001, t = 26.39, DF = 9), respectively, in comparison to Smn+/+; SMN2tg extracts (set as ‘1’, N = 10).