Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroinformatics. 2014 Oct;12(4):513–534. doi: 10.1007/s12021-014-9226-5

Fig. 17.

Fig. 17

Comparison of activation by our method and the traditional method using non-linear registration on DICCCOL landmarks. (a-c): Activations detected using the TN-0mm method. (d-f): Activations detected using the TN-5mm method. (a) and (d): Cortical surfaces mapped with activations from the traditional method, on which the red area represents activation. (b) and (e) are (a) and (d) overlaid with DICCCOLs (green spheres). (c) and (f): Selected activated DICCCOLs when they locate in the red areas of (b) and (e). (g): Activated DICCCOLs by our method.