Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 20;87(1043):20140229. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140229

Table 2.

Comparison of diagnostic yield between multislice CT (MSCT) and capsule endoscopy (CE) examinations

Diagnosis Pathogeny Overall Subgrouped by clinical bleeding pattern
Subgrouped by age
Overt bleeding subgroup Occult bleeding subgroup 40 years of age and older subgroup Younger than 40 years of age subgroup
MSCT Total numbers of allocated patients, n 82 49 33 43 39
Vascular abnormalities, n 4 3 1 3 1
Occupying lesions, n 17 12 5 6 11
Diverticulum, n 2 1 1 0 2
Polyp, n 2 1 1 1 1
Inflammatory lesions, n 14 8 6 9 5
Diagnostic yield, n (%) 39 (47.56%) 25 (51.02%) 14 (42.42%) 19 (44.19%) 20 (51.28%)
CE Total numbers of allocated patients, n 67 42 25 47 20
Vascular abnormalities, n 13 11 2 10 3
Occupying lesions, n 5 4 1 2 3
Diverticulum, n 3 2 1 2 1
Polyp, n 5 3 2 3 2
Mucosal protrusion, n 5 1 4 2 3
Mucosal inflammation, n 6 4 2 4 2
Ulcer/erosion, n 3 2 1 2 1
Intestinal bleeding, n 3 3 0 2 1
Hookworm, n 3 1 2 1 2
Diagnostic yield, n (%) 46 (68.66%)a 31 (76.19%)a 15 (60%) 29 (61.7%) 17 (85%)a
a

p < 0.05 compared with MSCT.