Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Res Educ Eff. 2014 Jun 30;7(3):250–267. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2014.906692

Table 2.

Results of multi-level model for reading measures in second grade predicted by intervention condition, group status, and interaction between intervention condition and group status

Letter Word Identification TOWRE Oral reading fluency Passage Comp
Fixed Effects
    Intercept 49.02 (3.55)*** 46.78 (3.71)*** 87.25 (4.69)*** 60.67 (3.30)***
    Male 2.40 (.76)** 2.58 (1.18)* −3.77 (2.53) 1.39 (.81)
    Free and reduced lunch −.25 (.98) −.55 (1.30) −5.59 (2.67)* −2.28 (.86)**
    Black −1.65 (.98) .63 (1.02) −3.69 (2.40) −2.64 (.85)**
    Others −.24 (1.84) 1.42 (2.29) .54 (6.33) −2.88 (1.48)*
    Grade 1 fall score .57 (.02)*** .63 (.03)*** .70 (.04)*** .42 (.03)***
    Dynamic condition −.39 (1.01) −.04 (1.28) −.97 (3.29) −1.06 (.94)
    Easy to remediate (ER) −7.31 (4.47) −18.13 (2.61)*** −40.49 (6.82)*** −4.51 (4.24)
    Sustained remediation (SR) −3.92 (.97)*** −9.63 (1.76)*** −17.07 (4.92)*** −2.21 (1.19)
    Dynamic*ER 14.00 (5.15)** 23.86 (3.13)*** 51.64 (8.59)*** 10.62 (4.54)*
    Dynamic* SR .94(1.78) 1.65 (2.78) −1.73 (6.40) .14 (1.87)
Variance Components
    Classroom 1.33 2.99 16.46 0
    Individuals 46.89*** 102.43*** 550.24*** 49.49***

Note: TOWRE = Test of Word Reading Efficiency; Passage comp = Passage comprehension