Table II.
Study | kt(hr−1) | IC50(ng/ml) | Rm(cells/mm3/hr) | Rb(cells/mm3/hr) | tz(hr) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dunn et al. (7) | 0.47 ± 0.10 | 18.8 ± 10.8 | 484 ± 107 | 127 ± 24 | 18.9 ± 2.8 |
Fisher et al. (13) | 0.54 ± 0.08 | 11.9 ± 4.8 | 477 ± 137 | 99 ± 27 | 17.3 ± 4.5 |
Kong et al. (14) | 0.56 ± 0.09 | 13.1 ± 8.4 | 502 ± 113 | 138 ± 49 | 16.5 ± 0.8 |
n = 6 for each study. No significant differences as compared by ANOVA.