Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 11;39(11):2519–2528. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.110

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Path model of associations between CB1 receptor availability measured with [11C]OMAR and positron emission tomography in the amygdala, attentional bias to threat, and threat symptomatology. **Significant association, p<0.01. The r2 for negative attentional bias=0.28; r2 for threat symptomatology=0.31. The dashed line indicates a nonsignificant association. The 95% confidence intervals for CB1 → attentional bias to threat =0.01–0.95; for attentional bias to threat → threat symptomatology =0.16–0.85.