Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 23;10(10):e1003900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003900

Figure 3. Two profiles of force and cup and ball displacement exemplify unpredictable dynamics (left) and predictable dynamics (right).

Figure 3

The strobing procedure is illustrated by the dots and the vertical lines: at every peak of the cup displacement, the value of force is picked; the strobed force values are then projected onto the vertical axis to show the distribution for each simulation. The left example shows a scattered distribution, while the right periodic profile only shows one value. The bifurcation diagram summarizes all force distributions as a function of the parameter Inline graphic, the initial ball angle. The vertical axis displays the stroboscopic samples of force values Inline graphic, simulated from a 1.0 Hz sinusoidal cup displacement Inline graphic with 10 cm (full peak-to-peak) amplitude and Inline graphicrad/s. The horizontal axis shows the initial ball angle Inline graphic. The plot shows that when the simulation starts from the initial angle Inline graphic = 1.0rad, the strobed force values do not change in successive cycles (blue), corresponding to the time profile on the right. At Inline graphicrad, there is variance in the strobed values of force Inline graphic, corresponding to the plot on the left (purple). The variance of Inline graphic was used to define a measure for the predictability of object's dynamics (see Predictability Index in the supporting Text S1).