Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2013 Oct 5;47(Pt 1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.015

Table 6.

Moderating Role of RNR Principle Adherence on the Likelihood of Adverse Outcomes

Adverse Outcome Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Externalizing
Internalizing
Other
RNR Principle Adherence Overall Boys Girls Overall Boys Girls Overall Boys Girls
Risk Principle
    Ratio of Number of Vulnerabilities to Number of Problem-Based Interventions 1.36 (0.98-1.89) 1.24 (0.88-1.76) 0.22 (0.02-3.09) 3.84 (0.58-25.47) 7.73 (0.42-142.98) 3.87 (0.54-27.47) 2.97 (0.41-21.79) 127.26 (0.01->300.0)
    Ratio of Number of Strengths to Number of Strength-Based Interventions 0.58 (0.38-0.89)* 0.69 (0.49-0.98)* 0.40 (0.15-1.03) 3.23 (0.34-31.12) 0.23 (0.01-3.78) 11.52 (0.83-159.17) 16.89 (0.56-506.78) 3.06 (0.05-173.54)
Need Principle
    Proportion of Critical Items Matched 0.36 (0.13-0.99)* 0.29 (0.01-38.11)* 0.67 (0.01-38.11) 0.19 (0.01-4.79) 0.09 (.01-5.60) 0.07 (<0.01-910.36)
Responsivity Principle
    Proportion of Key Items Matched 4.40 (0.73-26.44) 8.02 (1.12-57.28)*

Note: RNR = Risk-Needs-Responsivity; – = Cell Count Too Low for Analysis; CI = Confidence Interval; Externalizing = Verbal Violence, Property Violence, Physical Nonsexual Violence, Physical Sexual Violence, Unauthorized Leave, and Institutional Incidents; Internalizing = Suicide Ideation and Planning, Suicide Behaviors, and Self-Harm; Other = Being Victimized and Substance Abuse.

*

p < .05