Table 4.
Outlet type | Total crashes relative to population | HBD crashes relative to total crashes | SVN crashes relative to total crashes |
---|---|---|---|
Bar/pub density | |||
Local | −0.003% | 0.005% | 0.004% |
Spatially lagged | 0.007% | −0.002% | 0.030% |
Restaurant density | |||
Local | 0.025% | 0.003% | 0.002% |
Spatially lagged | −0.095% | 0.013% | −0.023% |
Off-premise density | |||
Local | −0.035% | −0.004% | −0.056% |
Spatially lagged | 0.061% | 0.018% | 0.005% |
Total retail density | |||
Local | 0.025% | −0.012% | −0.022% |
Spatially Lagged | 0.045% | −0.011% | −0.001% |
Note: this table simulates the average change in predicted crash or alcohol-involvement risks if every ZIP code had one percent more establishments of the specified outlet type than it actually had in each year. This simulation is based on posterior effect estimates from Table 3. Changes for well-supported outlet density effects are shown in bold.